Each Community provided in STONES is based on the city of Kingston circa 1870-1990) and is matched up to a specific Benchmark. These can be alternated by choice.
Black Community – Historical Significance
Chinese Community – Primary Sources
Prison Community – Cause and Consequence
Francophone Community – Continuity and Change
Jewish Community – Historical Perspectives
Gay & Lesbian Community – Moral Dimensions
The lessons are acquired and adapted from various sources but mainly from the Archives of Ontario website as well as the Benchmarks of History website.1 Each unit of study demonstrates links to the public school curriculum of the province of Ontario. There is the potential for many more links to the formal curriculum to be forged by teachers if the social studies and history lessons are integrated with other subjects, including language arts, French, and Geography, and adapted to suit the culture of particular classrooms and schools.
The culminating task identified in these educational units is primarily concerned with engaging students actively in historical research of their own communities. Further, it aims at relating classroom study to the realities of contemporary and past social life in the students’ communities. School life can thus be integrated with life outside the classroom through conference, discussion, debate, and ongoing research on social history. The historical habits of mind cultivated and practiced through the engagement with the benchmarks for historical thinking identified in these educational units will be applied to life in Canada, making explicit the connections between the study of history and such concepts as heritage, collective memory, citizenship, ethnicity, nationhood, and community.
This last emphasis takes up the call issued by Rosa Bruno-Jofré and Karen Steiner for the establishment of historical mindedness as an educational aim.2 Ken Osborne, had defined historical mindedness as related to historical thinking and historical consciousness, but necessarily “something bigger” than a technical ability to consider the past critically because it involved “a way of looking, not so much at history, but at the world at large, that derives from a familiarity with the past and with trying to understand and interpret it.”3 Osborne regarded historical mindedness as “a way of looking at the world derived from a way of looking at the past. As such, it is a valuable, indeed indispensable, attribute of democratic citizenship.”4 The study of history can, liberated both from an overly technical list of skills applicable only to the study of past events and from the practice of committing dates, names, and figures to memory, affect students’ “view of the world in which they live and of what it means to be human.”5 Following Bruno-Jofré and Steiner, the educational materials developed for the STONES project hold as eminently valuable the statement that historical mindedness should be “the keystone educational aim in relation to history education because, we believe, developing historical understanding provides a promising avenue for building a literate and critical citizenry.” 6
2 Bruno-Jofré, Rosa and Karen Steiner (2007). “Fostering Educative Experiences in Virtual High School History,” Encounters on Education 8, 69-82.
3 Osborne, Ken (2001). Review of the books “Knowing, teaching and learning history. Edited by P. Stearns, P. Seixas, and S. Weinburg (2000) New York University Press and “L’histoire à l’ école: Matière à penser. Robert Martineau (1999) Paris/Montreal: L’ Harmattan. In The Canadian Historical Review, 82(3), 552.
4 Ibid., 553. Osborne also notes that the concern for developing historical mindedness is not a new one. He discusses a report issued the by American Historical Association’s Committee of Seven (1899), which defined historical mindedness in terms of dispositions and outlooks rather than skills. These dispositions were vital to critical and effective citizenship in a democratic community, including a detachment from immediate pressures, a willingness to search for comparisons and analogies, a readiness to subject emotions to reason, consideration of multiple perspectives in issues, and weighing the forces of continuity or change.
5 Ibid., 553.
6 Bruno-Jofré, Rosa and Karen Steiner (2007). “Fostering Educative Experiences in Virtual High School History,” 79.